| The Ford Fusion has gained
popularity after its recent redesign and now sits among the top
10 best-selling automobiles (at spot number 10). The Mazda 6
hasn't been able cover as much ground but the good news is that
the Mazda 6 and Ford Fusion are closely related. They're not as
close as brothers like the Fusion and Mercury Milan are, but
more like cousins. They share the same platform and other parts
but designs fall into two completely different categories. |
| 2010
Ford Fusion |
vs |
2010
Mazda 6 |

The Ford Fusion is one of the first Ford's to incorporate the
upcoming new company look. The trapezoidal lower grill is a
fresh design and looks good accented by the fog lights. The triple
wide chrome grill is another story. Ford seems to have a
fascination with chrome these days and might've gone over the
top on this one. It doesn't necessarily look bad and actually
pulls it off with the extension over the headlights. |
|

The Mazda 6's front end styling depends on taste. The curvature
of the front fenders are distinctive and create a fluid look.
The overall look is more moderate than the Fusion and lacks the
aggressiveness. The main disappointment is the styling of the
lower grill that is bland and extends too far across the front
bumper. But if you like the look, enjoy it while you can. It's only a matter of time until
Mazda ruins the 6 like the rest of their models by adding the
gigantic smile to it. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
The 6's front fenders resemble the
RX-8 and pulled off various concept cars in the recent years.
They might look good on sports cars and concepts but on a sedan
is hit or miss. The most distinguishing feature of the Fusion
(aside from the grill) is the hood which is contoured handsomely
to match the front's design.
|
 |
|
 |
| The Mazda edges out the Fusion in
side profile design. The well-formed window shape contours to
the car's profile with perfect proportions. The more rigid Ford
has an misshapen C-pillar that is too large and cuts the window
silhouette too short. |
|
|

Ford seems to have trouble finishing off their designs well.
Just like the new Taurus, the rear is where things just
fall apart for the design beginning at the C-pillar. The tail lights, trunk design, and
even bumper look 1990s, or even 1980s. The rear profile is also
too tall for the body but at least it adds cargo space. |
|

The Mazda on the other hand, is where everything falls together
beautifully. Where the front might not appeal to all, it's hard
to deny the exquisiteness of the 6's rear. The tail lights are
elegant and flow into the bumper and trunk. Even the exhaust
pipes are unique and integrated well. |
|
 |
|
 |
| The Mazda wins hands down for rear
end styling. The profile is just the right size fitted with
stunning tail lights. Even the tail lights are magnificent and
integrated well into the rear bumper. The Ford is another story.
The already tall profile is made worse with the license plate
housing placed too high and misshapen tail lights. Once again,
chrome is added only this time to the trunk with the third brake
light awkwardly sitting on top. Lastly, the exhaust pipes look
1980s style just hanging there out of place. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| The blue trim shown in the Fusion
isn't standard (thank goodness). The layout designs are similar
to each other but the 6 looks a bit more refined. The Fusion's
materials look cheaper and the layout lacks the smoothness of
the 6. Functionality wise, Mazda added an information screen
atop of the center vents while Ford added a small closable
compartment instead. |