2011 Lexus LFA vs 2010 Nissan GT-R February 3, 2010 AUTORIVALS.NET
Share Share/Bookmark DiggThis submit to reddit
The all-new LFA (which has been in development for what seems like ages) is finally here and has caused a tremendous stir in the automotive industry. Not because of its price, performance, or features. But because it's from Lexus. Lexus (and Toyota) have long been known for their friendly, soft, and boring cars for a long time now. For them to come out with a supercar rivaling the best from America, England, Germany, Italy, and other parts of the world is cause for some shock.

The Lexus LFA arrives to dethrone the GT-R as the king of Japanese supercars. Many of you might think this comparison isn't fair. In a lot of ways it isn't depending on how you look at it. The $375,000+ price tag of the LFA is more than four times the price tag of the GT-R. An array of gizmos is included but more importantly, performance technology. A wide use of new carbon fiber and new weaving techniques matched with a powerful V10 engine puts it in an elite league of supercars. For all that money and all that technology though, it still can't dominate a GT-R.
2011 Lexus LFA vs 2010 Nissan GT-R
Although both cars have different styling themes, both look distinctively Japanese. They're not sleek and sexy like their Italian rivals but edgy with a technological feel, something styled more for the video game generation. The LFA has a lower front end fitted with large air openings and has a drag coefficient (Cd) of 0.31. The LFA's horizontal headlights and low front end give it a wider appearance than the GT-R.

Nissan put the GT-R's upper and lower grille front and center unlike the LFA's wide split air intakes. The black bar splitting the grilles isn't exactly the most elegant design but that's not what Nissan was going for. The front end isn't as low as the LFA but Nissan says they wanted a "chunky, edgy, wide shouldered" body. I'd say mission accomplished. Even with a chunkier front end, the GT-R manages a Cd of 0.27 beating the LFA and numerous other supercars.
The LFA trades in aluminum for Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) in the chassis. A Biggest Loser-worthy 221 pounds were lost in the process with 65 percent of the body structure being carbon fiber which is four times stronger than aluminum. The wheels are exquisite and better than the relatively generic looking GT-R's wheels.
The LFA is smaller and much lighter than the GT-R. The LFA is over 500 pounds lighter and over 5 inches shorter. It's really a mystery as to why the LFA can't achieve better performance numbers than it does considering a superior power-to-weight ratio. The GT-R however, benefits from more torque, the fantastic ATTESA E-TS all-wheel drive system, and sticky Dunlop tires that also help it achieve one of the best production Nürburgring lap times of 7:26.7 mins. The production version of the LFA hasn't been officially lapped yet but Auto Express reported an unofficial lap time of 7:24 mins for the concept version (you have to take that number with a grain of salt though).
The six inch difference in height (the LFA is shorter) is substantial between the two supercars. The LFA's roofline takes a smoother shape from front to back. The side air scoops are a nice touch with the upper scoop being distinctively unique. The door mirrors are actually designed to channel air into it.

Nissan designers actually said they didn't want "a nice elegant shape" for the GT-R. They wanted "an original shape" which is achieved with the blacked out A-pillar and kinked C-pillar that also helps rear airflow. The front fender vent also helps in aerodynamics and cooling the engine. The GT-R isn't as exotic as the LFA but it'll still get its fair share of attention and admiration.
The massive rear grilles of the LFA are another distinctive look which the LFA pulls off well. It's not the sexiest design but adds a bit of muscular flair. They're nicely integrated with a visual connection with the taillights which are a sharp, clean design. The GT-R's lights pay homage to its predecessors and are arguably the best looking taillights yet of any Skyline models.
Carbon fiber is used for the LFA's rear diffuser that places the stacked triple exhaust in the center. The exhaust design is a bit over the top and probably would've looked just as good or better with the dual twin-exhaust pipe layout of the GT-R. The LFA's active rear wing is a bit short in width but still nicely proportioned with the rear window. It deploys at 50 mph to help improve downforce and handling. The GT-R's static rear spoiler has more of a sport-tuner look as do the gigantic exhaust pipes that are nearly as large as the taillights.
The price difference is most notable in the interiors. The LFA gets premium quality materials that the GT-R is no match for. The cabin is hand-built with a nicer, more modern layout and filled with technological enhancements. The instrument panel is an LCD display that changes appearance depending on which mode you're in and also glows red when you approach the 9,000 rpm redline. It includes a lap timer next to a digital tachometer which is required instead of an analog one because an analog tach would be too slow for the fast revving engine. The screen is controlled by a button on the flat-bottom steering wheel which also houses the engine start/stop button.

Another screen is placed in the center console which is controlled by Lexus' Remote Touch joystick system which is being regarded as one of the best in the industry. The seats are upholstered in leather and Alcantara and matched with seatbelt airbags that inflate in the event of a crash. The interior is customizable with various colors like the exterior which has an available 30 different colors to choose from. Carbon fiber is also used throughout the interior to compliment the exterior.

The GT-R's interior isn't quite as upscale but still has its fair share of technology. The creators of Gran Turismo were actually involved in developing the customizable multifunction center screen. It gives drivers information overload including numerous temperatures and pressures, longitudinal and lateral G-force, and much, much more. It can even be used to improve driving technique making it not just a car, but a driving professor.
SPECIFICATIONS
PRICE: $375,000
ENGINE: 4.8L V10
HORSEPOWER: 553 hp
TORQUE: 354 lb-ft
SIZE (L x W x H): 177.4 x 74.6 x 48.0 in.
WEIGHT: 3,263 - 3,483 lbs
0-60 MPH: 3.6 sec
0-100 MPH: 7.8 sec
1/4 MILE: 11.8 sec @ 124 mph
TOP SPEED: 202 mph
ROADHOLDING: 1.02 g
BRAKING: 60-0 mph: 95 ft.
FUEL (CITY/HWY): 14 / 20 mpg
Share/Bookmark
SPECIFICATIONS
SpecV Specifications Not Included
PRICE: $80,790 - $83,040
ENGINE: 3.8L V6 Twin-Turbocharged
HORSEPOWER: 485 hp
TORQUE: 434 lb-ft
SIZE (L x W x H): 183.1 x 74.9 x 54.0 in.
WEIGHT: 3,814 - 3,829 lbs
0-60 MPH: 3.5 sec
0-100 MPH: 8.2 sec
1/4 MILE: 11.9 sec @ 120 mph
TOP SPEED: 193 mph
ROADHOLDING: 0.97 g
BRAKING: 60-0 mph: 104 ft.
FUEL (CITY/HWY): 16 / 21 mpg
RECAP RECAP

PROS
+Exotic, in a Japanese way
+Extensive use of carbon fiber
+Over 300 pounds lighter
+Low-slung profile
+Unique design elements

CONS
-Still can't dominate the GT-R's performance numbers
-It costs how much?

PROS
+You can buy 4 GT-Rs for the price of 1 LFA and still get change back
+Outperforms numerous supercars
+Distinctive shape

CONS
-Doesn't have a supercar front fascia
-Cheap looking interior
Video Source: Top Gear via YouTube Video Source: Top Gear via YouTube
NOTES
There's more to these supercars than just numbers. Even though the GT-R keeps up or even outruns the LFA, it can't match its finesse, premium quality, and exclusivity. All the benefits of a lightweight carbon fiber chassis can't be seen on paper either.

If you think $350,000+ for a Lexus is outrageous, get this: Lexus will lose money on every single LFA they sell as it costs more to build than the price tag. If you wanted one (and can afford it), they're already selling out.

For the 2010 model, Nissan has updated the launch control on the GT-R after owners have been abusing it and therefore voiding their warranties. In an effort to reduce the amount of damage done, the new setup is reduced to one setting resulting in a more reliable transmission, but worse performance numbers.
2009 Nissan GT-R
SpecV Specifications Not Included
0-60 MPH: 3.2 sec (w/ launch control)
3.5 sec (w/ launch control)
1/4 MILE: 11.6 sec @ 120 mph
TOP SPEED: 193 mph
2010 Nissan GT-R
SpecV Specifications Not Included
0-60 MPH: 3.5 sec
1/4 MILE: 11.9 sec @ 120 mph
TOP SPEED: 193 mph

While the LFA might be a few ticks faster to 60 and through the quarter-mile than the GT-R, it isn't what you'd expect for a car costing more than four times as much.
RELATED COMPARISONS
2010 Nissan GT-R vs 2010 Porsche 911 GT3

2010 Ferrari 458 Italia vs 2011 McLaren MP4-12C

2010 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 vs 2010 Dodge Viper SRT10 ACR

2011 Lamborghini Gallardo LP570-4 Superleggera vs 2011 Ferrari 458 Italia

2011 Lamborghini Gallardo LP570-4 Superleggera vs 2011 McLaren MP4-12C

2010 Audi R8 vs 2010 Lamborghini Gallardo

2011 Mercedes-Benz CL-Class vs 2011 Aston Martin DB9
Auto Rivals